Need Analysis Of CEFR Based Multisensorial Listening Activities For Middle School Students In Cirebon
Abstract
This study explores the conceptual characteristics and classroom-based needs of implementing multisensory listening instruction aligned with the CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference) assessment. Using a qualitative needs analysis approach, the study aims to answer two research questions: (1) What are the characteristics of multisensory listening learning through the CEFR assessment? and (2) How are teachers and students’ needs in teaching and learning multisensory listening through the CEFR assessment? The data were collected through conceptual synthesis of relevant literature and semi-structured interviews with two English teachers and two students at MTs Mafatihul Huda Cirebon, Indonesia. Findings revealed six core dimensions of multisensory listening: multimodal sensory engagement, emotional and motivational activation, cognitive-metacognitive scaffolding, technological and game-based facilitation, inclusivity and differentiated learning, and real-world cultural grounding. These dimensions support CEFR descriptors related to listening comprehension, sociolinguistic competence, and pragmatic awareness. Interview data further highlighted the need for CEFR-based listening materials that are emotionally engaging, culturally relevant, and adapted to the technological and pedagogical realities of local classrooms. Teachers expressed the need for practical resources and training in CEFR-oriented listening assessment, while students emphasized the importance of visual, contextual, and relatable content. The study concludes that effective implementation of multisensory listening through the CEFR requires an integrated approach that combines curriculum design, teacher support, and localized material development.
Keywords: multisensory listening, CEFR, needs analysis, EFL, listening comprehension, teacher–student perspectivesThis study explores the conceptual characteristics and classroom-based needs of implementing multisensory listening instruction aligned with the CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference) assessment. Using a qualitative needs analysis approach, the study aims to answer two research questions: (1) What are the characteristics of multisensory listening learning through the CEFR assessment? and (2) How are teachers and students’ needs in teaching and learning multisensory listening through the CEFR assessment? The data were collected through conceptual synthesis of relevant literature and semi-structured interviews with two English teachers and two students at MTs Mafatihul Huda Cirebon, Indonesia. Findings revealed six core dimensions of multisensory listening: multimodal sensory engagement, emotional and motivational activation, cognitive-metacognitive scaffolding, technological and game-based facilitation, inclusivity and differentiated learning, and real-world cultural grounding. These dimensions support CEFR descriptors related to listening comprehension, sociolinguistic competence, and pragmatic awareness. Interview data further highlighted the need for CEFR-based listening materials that are emotionally engaging, culturally relevant, and adapted to the technological and pedagogical realities of local classrooms. Teachers expressed the need for practical resources and training in CEFR-oriented listening assessment, while students emphasized the importance of visual, contextual, and relatable content. The study concludes that effective implementation of multisensory listening through the CEFR requires an integrated approach that combines curriculum design, teacher support, and localized material development.
Keywords: multisensory listening, CEFR, needs analysis, EFL, listening comprehension, teacher–student perspectives
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
CopyrightNotice
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursuit of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors, the editorial board, and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance with the journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The author(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The author(s) should inform the editors about any conflicts of interest and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the work) in institutional repositories or on their websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published work in the journal.
