Developing Autoplay-Based Media for Learning Asking and Giving Suggestions at Senior High School
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The educational field has shifted from traditional classroom settings primarily using printed learning resources to a technological-based learning system. This study was intended to develop AutoPlay-based media for learning Asking and Giving Suggestions at Senior High School. The purpose of this study is to find out the characteristics of AutoPlay-based media and develop the AutoPlay-based media for learning speaking. This study employed a qualitative approach using the R&D method with ADDIE model. The primary data source for this study comes from journals, articles, books, and others while the secondary data comes from English teachers. The researcher gathered data through a literature review and interviews. The English teacher is a participant in this study. The result shows that there are 12 characteristics of AutoPlay-based media for learning speaking. They are: (1) learning media should combine audio and visual elements, (2) Learning objectives should be clearly stated in the media, (3) Media has a well-defined learning flow, (4) Media provides conclusions, examples, and evaluations for students, (5) Media can motivate students to learn, (6) Use language that students can easy to understand, (7) Materials contents should be consistent with the standard and fundamental competencies and relevant to the Curriculum 2013, (8) The content of the materials should be constantly updated, (9) The content of the materials should be applicable in a variety of contexts, (10) Learning media should be used to present materials in a timely manner while also stimulating students speaking skills, (11) Learning media should focus on the suitability of the speaking materials for students, and (12) Pay attention to aspects of speaking when assessing students' speaking skills. The AutoPlay-based media developed based on 12 characteristics have been found in the need analysis.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
CopyrightNotice
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursuit of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors, the editorial board, and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance with the journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The author(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The author(s) should inform the editors about any conflicts of interest and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the work) in institutional repositories or on their websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published work in the journal.