Quovadis Kebijakan Study Tour Sekolah? Sebuah Perbedaan Perspektif Antara Kebijakan Gubernur Jawa Barat dan Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Section Articles

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 30, 2025
https://doi.org/10.54213/tsaqafatuna.v7i2.686
Download
pdf
Statistic
Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Inovasi Pendidikan Agama Islam

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Faizal Amir
STIT Buntet Pesantren Cirebon
Muhamad Mujadid
STIT Buntet Pesantren Cirebon
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0905-9289
Moh Saiful Bakhril Amin
STIT Buntet Pesantren Cirebon

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the policy dynamics behind the study tour ban issued by the Governor of West Java and compare it with the approach taken by the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. Using a qualitative-descriptive approach and grounded in several theoretical frameworks—including the Policy Cycle Theory, Multiple Streams Framework (MSF), Asymmetric Decentralization and Intergovernmental Relations (IGR), Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL), Experiential Learning, Critical Theory in Education, and the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF)—this research finds that the policy divergence stems from differences in policy stages, central-local government dynamics, and conflicting values between pedagogical goals and social justice concerns. A survey of 62 respondents comprising teachers, school principals, retired educators, and education officials reveals that most support out-of-school learning activities, provided they are educational, affordable, safe, and inclusive. The findings suggest that a total ban on study tours contradicts the principles of contextual learning and character education. Therefore, a redefinition of study tours as structured educational visits is necessary, along with improved policy coordination between central and regional authorities to realize an equitable, relevant, and student-centered education policy.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Amir, F., Muhamad Mujadid, & Moh Saiful Bakhril Amin. (2025). Quovadis Kebijakan Study Tour Sekolah? : Sebuah Perbedaan Perspektif Antara Kebijakan Gubernur Jawa Barat dan Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. TSAQAFATUNA : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.54213/tsaqafatuna.v7i2.686

References

  1. Afrizal, A. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Sebuah Upaya Untuk Mendukung Penggunaan Penelitian Kualitatif Dalam Berbagai Disiplin Ilmu.”. PT Raja Grafindo.
  2. Anggraini, T., & Ulfa, S. W. (2022). The Influence of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Models on Student Activities and Learning Outcomes on Plant Seeds Material in First Grade (X Class) Senior High School. Jurnal Pembelajaran Dan Biologi Nukleus, 8(2), 470–480.
  3. Apple, M. W. (2019). Critical education, critical theory, and the critical scholar/activist. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
  4. Ayoub Mahmoudi, D., Khoshnood, A., & Babaei, A. (2014). Paulo Freire’s critical pedagogy and its implications in curriculum planning. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(14), 86–91.
  5. Bafadal, M. F. (2019). The Effect of Study Tour Activity in Teaching Junior High School Students Speaking Skill. Linguistics and ELT Journal, 6(1), 11–19.
  6. Benadusi, L. (2001). Equity and Education: a critical review of sociological research and thought. In Pursuit of Equity in Education: Using International Indicators to Compare Equity Policies, 25–64.
  7. Bergh, A. (2015). Local educational actors doing of education–a study of how local autonomy meets international and national quality policy rhetoric. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(2), 28146.
  8. Dabamona, S. (2020). School trips and experiential learning in eastern Indonesia. Swansea University.
  9. Djafar, F., & Ap, S. (2024). Teori administrasi publik pendekatan analisis dan penerapan. Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing).
  10. Hains-Wesson, R., & Appleby, M. (2017). A perspective on third-party providers and study tour programs: A mixed method study. Issues in Educational Research, 27(3), 435–452.
  11. Ibrahim, E. (2021). Mengenal sejarah otonomi daerah dalam sistem pemerintahan daerah. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 3(5), 90–97.
  12. Ieong, F. F. (2024). Research on Macao Study Tour Policy and Cross-strait Cultural Construction on the Macao Local Government Cultural Industry—Taking the “Ten Thousand Persons Plan.” Lex Localis, 22(4), 372–408. https://doi.org/10.52152/22.4.372-408(2024)
  13. Imam Gunawan. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bumi Aksara.
  14. Imaniriho, D. (2015). Local Ownership of Education Policies at the Crossroads between the Active Participation and the Passive Compliance to International Goals. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(2), 45–52.
  15. Inglis, P. (2023). Critical approaches to private education in the Global South. Sociology Compass, 17(5), e13080.
  16. Jann, W., & Wegrich, K. (2017). Theories of the policy cycle. In Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 69–88). Routledge.
  17. Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.
  18. Lexy J. Moeleong. (2023). Metodologi penelitian. Laksana.
  19. Malandrino, A. (2023). Adopting the Multiple Streams Framework to Understand the Preconditions of Policy Decisions. In Migrant Languages in Education: Problems, Policies, and Politics (pp. 27–37). Springer.
  20. Mariani, E. (2020). Pemikiran Henry A. Giroux tentang Pendidikan Kritis, Peran Guru sebagai Intelektual Transformatif dan Relevansinya bagi Pembelajaran pada Sekolah di Indonesia. Driyarkara School of Philosophy.
  21. Marpaung, M., Trihayuningtyas, E., & Suryadana, M. L. (2022). THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EDUCATIONAL TOURISM DEVELOPMENT BY DINAS KEPEMUDAAN OLAHRAGA PARIWISATA DAN KEBUDAYAAN KABUPATEN PURWAKARTA:(A CASE STUDY OF PURWAKARTA MUSEUMS). International Journal of Sustainable Competitiveness on Tourism, 1(02), 17–25.
  22. Meral, E. O., van Beest, I., & Karaduman, C. (2023). Raising awareness about social exclusion in schools through experiential learning. Social Psychology of Education, 26(2), 367–381.
  23. Miao, S. Y., & Harris, R. (2012). Learning and personality on study tours abroad. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 17(4), 435–452.
  24. Müller-Doohm, S. (2017). Member of a school or exponent of a paradigm? Jürgen Habermas and critical theory. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(2), 252–274.
  25. Mulyana, A., Vidiati, C., Danarahmanto, P. A., Agussalim, A., Apriani, W., Fiansi, F., Fitra, F., Aryawati, N. P. A., Ridha, N. A. N., & Milasari, L. A. (2024). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Penerbit Widina.
  26. Pierce, J. J., Giordono, L. S., Peterson, H. L., & Hicks, K. C. (2022). Common approaches for studying advocacy: Review of methods and model practices of the Advocacy Coalition Framework. The Social Science Journal, 59(1), 139–158.
  27. Powell, M., & Mannion, R. (2022). Modelling the health policy process: one size fits all or horses for courses? International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 12, 7580.
  28. Rahmatunnisa, M., Hindersah, R., & Achmad, T. H. (2018). Why Regions with Archipelagic Characteristics in Indonesia Also Need Asymmetric Decentralization? Jurnal Bina Praja, 10(2), 251–261.
  29. Rivaldi, A., Feriawan, F. U., & Nur, M. (2023). Metode pengumpulan data melalui wawancara. Metode Pengumpulan Data Melalui Wawancara.
  30. Ryoo, J. J., & Crawford, J. (2023). Critical theory in qualitative research in education.
  31. Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2019). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In Theories of the policy process, second edition (pp. 189–220). Routledge.
  32. Setyosari, H. P. (2016). Metode penelitian pendidikan & pengembangan. Prenada Media.
  33. Simatele, M. (2022). The Intersection of Social Inequities and Marginalization in Education: Towards a Praxis. In Global Perspectives on Microaggressions in Higher Education (pp. 105–124). Routledge.
  34. Stoker, G. (1995). Intergovernmental relations. Public Administration, 73(1), 101–122.
  35. Strunk, K. K., & Betties, J. S. (2019). Using critical theory in educational research. Research Methods for Social Justice and Equity in Education, 71–79.
  36. Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan : Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D, Edisi IV. alfabeta.
  37. Sun, F.-R., & Xu, T.-Z. (2021). The study tour in China: An emerging mode for practical education. Sustainability, 13(21), 11969.
  38. Swanson, T. (2022). Enhancing Student Experiences Outside the Classroom: Industry Tour and Study Abroad Opportunities. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 100, 122.
  39. Weible, C. M., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (2016). The advocacy coalition framework: An approach for the comparative analysis of contentious policy issues. In Contemporary approaches to public policy: Theories, controversies and perspectives (pp. 15–34). Springer.
  40. Zen, M., Supiyandi, S., Rizal, C., Rahman, S., & Irwan, I. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Siswa Study Tour