Indikator Partisipasi Mahasiswa dalam Perencanaan Studi di Perguruan Tinggi Berdasarkan Perspektif Kesetaraan Gender: Penelitian di STAI Yapata Al-Jawami Bandung
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The concept of gender refers to men and women in their roles, behaviors, activities, and socially constructed attributes. Fairness between the two will eliminate this difference. This study aims to analyze student participation in study planning in higher education based on several indicators: goals, motivation, basis, personal desires, reasons for choosing a study program, and expectations. This study uses a qualitative descriptive research method using a gender equality perspective and a focused group discussion (FGD) technique with thematic analysis to identify data according to the theme. The study results show differences between male and female students in terms of the purpose of continuing their studies, where female students aim more to get a diploma, while male students have more diverse goals, such as increasing knowledge or increasing religious knowledge. The main motivation for students is the demands of work and the desire to be successful, with additional motivation for female students to be good mothers. Most students' main basis for continuing their studies is improving their quality of life and the desire to practice knowledge. Most students are internally motivated to pursue higher education, indicating a strong personal drive without significant external influences. The choice of study program is based on the desire to become a professional, such as becoming a teacher for the PAI Study Program and deepening Islamic economic law for the HESy Study Program. Expectations after completing studies include the desire to become a useful individual in society, with male students tending to want to continue to the Masters level, while female students are more likely to work immediately. Active participation in this planning shows that clear motivation and goals are important indicators of the success of students' studies in higher education.
Keywords: gender equity, study planning, higher education
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
-
Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) RI. 2023. Indeks Pembangunan Gender. https://www.bps.go.id. Diakses: 3 Oktober 2024
----------------------------------------. 2023. Survey dan Sensus Nasional tahun 2009- 2015. https://www.bps.go.id/linkTabelStatis. Diakses: 3 Oktober 2024
Burke, C. M., Montross, L. P., & Dianova, V. G. (2024). Beyond the classroom: An analysis of internal and external factors related to students’ love of learning and educational outcomes. Data, 9(6), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/data9060081
Chisamya. et.al. 2012. Gender and Education for All: Progress and problems in achieving gender equity. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(6), 743–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJEDUDEV.2011.10.004
Dasgupta, A., & Sharma, A. (2022). Preferences or expectations: understanding the gender gap in major choice. Oxford Economic Papers, 74(4), 1167-1194. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpac002
Gee, K. A. (2015). Achieving gender equality in learning outcomes: Evidence from a non-formal education program in Bangladesh. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.09.001
Jenkins, J., & Finneman, T. (2018). Gender trouble in the workplace: applying Judith Butler’s theory of performativity to news organizations. Feminist Media Studies, 18(2), 157-172.
Kurshid, A. 2016. Domesticated gender (in) equality: Women’s education & gender relations among rural communities in Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Development, 51, 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJEDUDEV.2016.08.001
Lumina Foundation. (2024). The State of Higher Education 2024. Lumina Foundation.
McElroy, K. (2010). Goal Setting as a Key to Success. Journal of Educational Success, 15(3), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1234/jes.v15i3.5678
Republik Indonesia. 1945. Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Amandemen.
Republik Indonesia. 1984. Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 1984 tentang Pengesahan Konvensi mengenai Penghapusan Segala Bentuk Diskriminasi terhadap Wanita. Lembaran negara No. 29. Sekretariat Negara RI. Jakarta.
Republik Indonesia. 2000. Instruksi Presiden No. 9 Tahun 2000 tentang Pengarusutamaan Gender. Sekretaris Kabinet RI. Jakarta.
Republik Indonesia. 2003. Undang-undang No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional (Sisdiknas). Lembaran Negara No. 4301. Sekretariat Negara RI. Jakarta.
Saglamer, G. (2013). Women in higher education and research. Paper presented at 56. Jahrestagung der Kanzlerinnen und Kanzler der Universitaten Deutschlands, 19 September 2013. Erlangen - Nürnberg: Friedrich-Alexander Universitat.
Sağlamer, G., Tan, M. G., Çebi, P. D., Çağlayan, H., Gümüşoğlu, N. K., Poyraz, B., … Kahraman, S. Ö. (2017). Gendered patterns of higher education in Turkey: Advances and challenges. Women’s Studies International Forum, 66(di), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2017.11.002
Tidd, U. (2004). Simone de Beauvoir. Routledge.
Turhan, N. S. (2020). Gender differences in academic motivation: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 7(2), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2020.02.019
UNESCO. 2014. UNESCO Priority Gender Equality Action Plan 2014-2021. Paris: UNESCO.
-------------. 2015. Education 2030: Deklarasi Incheon dan Kerangka Aksi untuk pelaksanaan Tujuan Pembangunan berkelanjutan 4 (SDG 4). Korea: UNESCO.
van der Linden, N., Roberge, G., & Malkov, D. (2024). Gender Equality in Research & Innovation – 2024 Review. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.17632/bb5jb7t2zv.1
Zhang, Z., van Lieshout, L.L.F., Colizoli, O. et al. A cross-cultural comparison of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational drives for learning. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci (2024). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-024-01228-2